The VO₂ Accuracy of Wearables | Peter Attia
Peter Attia explains why wearable VO₂ max estimates are unreliable, covering how inaccurate heart rate sensors and guesswork algorithms can produce swings of up to 20 points.
The gist
-
Wearables estimate VO₂ max from heart rate, pace, and demographics rather than measuring gas exchange directly, so the numbers are inherently imprecise.
-
Wrist optical heart rate sensors can be off by 5 to 10 percent or more, which compounds the error in any downstream VO₂ max calculation.
-
A reading of 52 on a wearable could reflect a true VO₂ max anywhere from 42 to 62, making it too imprecise for serious fitness planning.
-
Attia says heavy zone 2 training can cause wearables to underestimate VO₂ max automatically, without the user having any control over when estimates are generated.
Peter, Joe, Tim and Andrew agree on 38 things
See what they all use, in their own words. Paid ads are left out.
See what they all swear by Or pick your own peopleRelated episodes
Episodes covering similar topics