Gemini Pro
One kind of Gemini. Also: Flash.
3 creators use or recommend it
▲ 2 active in the last 90 days
Recently discussed in
How Gemini Pro compares
9 creators weighed in
Grouped with Claude 4.7 as capable but below GPT-5.5 Pro for highly complex cases
D
K
G
4 creators
D
K
G
4 creators
Grouped with Claude 4.7 as capable but below GPT-5.5 Pro for highly complex cases
K
G
K
G
"If I'm going to diagnose and treat a subtype of lung cancer, I'm pretty sure Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude 4.7 — they all do a pretty good job."
Grouped with Claude 4.7 as capable but below GPT-5.5 Pro for highly complex cases
"Look at this Fable 5 compared to Opus 48, GPT55 and Gemini 3.1 Pro."
Used as benchmark comparison, with Fable 5 outperforming it
"My favorite UI model is Gemini mostly. I think it's either as good or better than Gemini for design, which is great because if one model can do everything."
Compared favorably to other models for design, though Kieran thinks Opus 4.8 may now be as good
"I remember when Gemini 3.1 Pro came out and it was mind-blowing to me. It was so good. And today it's intolerable."
Previously competitive but now fallen behind Claude and ChatGPT on Pareto frontier
One of the big three with ChatGPT and Claude; he calls it weirdly neurotic and self-flagellating when told it did a bad job
E
3 creators
E
3 creators
One of the big three with ChatGPT and Claude; he calls it weirdly neurotic and self-flagellating when told it did a bad job
"Anthropic 4.5 Opus and Gemini 3 Pro. Those are the sort of starting pack of tools you can use. They're all capable of doing agentic work... Gemini is an interesting set. Very smart overall model. Weirdly neurotic."
One of the big three with ChatGPT and Claude; he calls it weirdly neurotic and self-flagellating when told it did a bad job
"GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro preview are all around just north of a thousand ELO on chess benchmark."
Compared to GPT-5.5 on chess ELO benchmark; both around 1000 ELO.
"The model that I forgot we were testing scored the best. Gemini 3 Pro up here at the top of the leaderboard, tied with the brand new drop Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.5. I was not expecting Gemini to be at the top of this leaderboard."
Topped the automated leaderboard tied with Sonnet 5 and ChatGPT 5.5; Claire personally ranked it lowest among her taste preferences, calling its output bare bones
Discussed in context of AI model versioning/numbering strategies alongside OpenAI and Anthropic
3 creators
3 creators
Discussed in context of AI model versioning/numbering strategies alongside OpenAI and Anthropic
"Going into the Gemini app right now and seeing that there's 3.5 Flash but then you have to go back to 3.1 Pro. I think 3.1 Pro is the most advanced model, but they default you to 3.1 Flash Light. I would expect them to jump forward to fo..."
Discussed in context of AI model versioning/numbering strategies alongside OpenAI and Anthropic
"Gemini 2.5 Pro was the moment — that was as good as it was, but it wasn't enough."
Compared unfavorably to OpenAI and Anthropic models; described as Google's best but still 'not enough'
"Everyone was hoping for this model to be released, Gemini 3.5 Pro, which was their Frontier model, but by the looks of it, it's not going to actually be Frontier"
Not as good as Composer 2.5, well behind OpenAI and Anthropic
Which version
Each new Pro replaces the last.
2 creators didn't say which. Their quotes are labeled with when they said it, so you can tell which was out at the time.
What creators say
"I'm using Gemini Pro, which is the most advanced model. I always use it for fact-checking and stuff."
More from Steven Bartlett →"I'm already having Gemini Pro 3, whatever it is, doing all my legal analysis and it's incredible."
More from Jason Oppenheim →"Anthropic 4.5 Opus and Gemini 3 Pro. Those are the sort of starting pack of tools you can use. They're all capable of doing agentic work... Gemini is an interesting set. Very smart overall model. Weirdly neurotic."
More from Ethan Mollick →
"GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro preview are all around just north of a thousand ELO on chess benchmark."
More from John Coogan →+1 more mention from John
"Going into the Gemini app right now and seeing that there's 3.5 Flash but then you have to go back to 3.1 Pro. I think 3.1 Pro is the most advanced..."
"If I'm going to diagnose and treat a subtype of lung cancer, I'm pretty sure Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude 4.7 — they all do a pretty good job."
More from Derya Unutmaz →
"Google, by the way, still not on the optimal frontier. Gemini 3.5 Pro reportedly delayed. Hope that Google catches up, ironically, to the optimal frontier and we get five American labs."
More from Peter Diamandis →
"Gemini 2.5 Pro was the moment — that was as good as it was, but it wasn't enough."
More from Garry Tan →
"You can see it's about on par with GPT 5.5 and almost up to Claude Opus 4.8, certainly beating Gemini 3.1 Pro."
More from Claire Vo →
"Look at this Fable 5 compared to Opus 48, GPT55 and Gemini 3.1 Pro."
More from How I AI →"I saw this great tweet that was like is it Bard or Gemini Pro or Spark or like you like wha- whatever the thing is"
More from Matt Colyer →
"By the way, we also live tested Claude 4.5 against Gemini Pro and the results were quite interesting."
More from Greg Isenberg →
"Obviously, these are not the actions of people excited about Gemini 4 Pro."
"Google's Gemini 3.5 Pro is months behind with some company sources telling Axios that it's in part due to low morale."
"Poor, poor, sweet, sweet Gemini 3.1 Pro, just never going to get it to do. Come on, Google. We want to have a win for you. I am just sorry, babe, but you were just not good."
"Everyone was hoping for this model to be released, Gemini 3.5 Pro, which was their Frontier model, but by the looks of it, it's not going to actually be Frontier"
Creators also endorse
Sponsored mentions
These creators mentioned this product during a paid promotion
"Gemini 3.1 Pro is here with a more capable baseline. It's great for super complex tasks like visualizing difficult concepts."
+4 more episodes
Keep exploring
About this data
- ✓45,000+ mentions extracted from real podcast transcripts
- ✓Every quote links to the source episode
- ✓Sponsored mentions are always labeled
- ✓Critical takes are shown, never filtered out