Why the Climate-Doom Story Is Wrong — Hannah Ritchie
Hannah Ritchie joins Scott Galloway to argue that climate doom thinking is wrong, and that data shows real progress on clean energy alongside gradual rather than catastrophic impacts.
The gist
-
Ritchie says climate thresholds like 1.5°C are sliding scales, not cliffs, so progress stays worthwhile even after key targets are missed.
-
Global deaths from climate disasters have fallen sharply over a century because development, building codes, and early warning systems outpaced rising hazards.
-
Hard-to-abate sectors like cement, which accounts for 7% of global emissions, and steel offer early-stage investment opportunities that most capital ignores.
-
Ritchie says switching to electric vehicles saves far more money through fuel costs than electricity price cuts alone, making it the top personal decarbonization move.
The Prof G Pod – Scott Galloway and This Week in Startups agree on 3 things
See what they all use, in their own words. Paid ads are left out.
See what they all swear by Or pick your own people
◎
Related episodes
Episodes covering similar topics
Elon Musk’s Space Centers Are a “Fever Dream” | Office Hours
climate change
"Go Woke, Go Broke"? Texas Runs on Renewables Now
electrification
What we’ll learn from Anthropic’s $2-$3T IPO | E2325
renewable energy
The $400k Skill AI Can’t Replace | Deep Dive
Oct 14, 2026