The AI Slowdown Debate | Diet TBPN
John Coogan and Jordi Hays join TBPN to break down Dario Amodei's essay proposing ways to slow AI development and the legal, political, and competitive problems that follow.
The gist
-
Coordinating AI labs on safety standards would likely violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, making any formal pacing arrangement legally difficult to pull off.
-
Third-party evaluators like MITER may lack real independence because their staff often come from the same labs they are supposed to oversee.
-
Heavy regulation aimed at frontier labs could hit small startups hardest, forcing tiny teams to spend years on compliance instead of building products.
-
Trump has publicly called AI safety concerns a conspiracy and is pushing for acceleration, which limits how much formal oversight the White House will support.
Also mentioned
1:28
Wall Street Journal
· "It's on the cover of the Wall Street Journal, so you know it's important news — tennis's US Open climaxes..."
3:30
OpenAI
· "The pacing the frontier statement, an open letter, was signed by employees and leaders from OpenAI,..."
3:30
Google DeepMind
· "The pacing the frontier statement, an open letter, was signed by employees and leaders from OpenAI,..."
4:18
Anthropic
· "August 31st, Anthropic official Anthropic post explicitly discusses pacing the frontier and calls for..."
5:39
Financial Times
· "Sunday morning, the Financial Times reports that Donald Trump has rejected calls from tech bosses for an AI..."
◎
Related episodes
Episodes covering similar topics
More from TBPN
🗽 Live from NYSE
Nov 02, 2026
Warren Buffett & Charlie Munger LIVE on TBPN 🎃
Oct 30, 2026